Success Rate of Intentional Replantation of Endodontically Treated Teeth “A Systematic Review”

¹BDS, MASTER Advanced Oral Sugary and Dental Implantologi, UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI “ALDO MORO” Bari, Italy

²BDS, MDS Operative Dentistry, Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Medical University, PIMS, Islamabad, Pakistan

³BDS, MCS Endodontics, MCPS resident Periodontology, Federal Government Services Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan

*Corresponding Author: Sirrage Kazi M Yaqoob, BDS, MASTER Advanced Oral Sugary and Dental Implantologi, UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI “ALDO MORO” Bari, Italy, Phone: 00966549519798; E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected]

Received Date: August 04, 2023

Published Date: July 12, 2024

Citation: Yaqoob SKM, et al. (2024). Success Rate of Intentional Replantation of Endodontically Treated Teeth “A Systematic Review”. Mathews J Dentistry. 8(3):50.

Copyrights: Yaqoob SKM, et al. © (2024).

ABSTRACT

Introduction: This study aimed to systematically assess the outcomes of intentional replantation (IR) of teeth and to determine success rate of the treatment. A search was conducted for all relevant English language articles published in the previous ten years Methods: The search terms included “intentional replantation” and “teeth” according to the inclusion criteria. Two reviewersindependently screened the literature based on the inclusion criteria.

First, the reviewers read the relevant abstracts from the literature.

Second, to evaluate literature quality, the full texts were obtained, including the inclusion criteria, relevant information on the first author,  publication year, type of study, number of cases, age and outcomes.

Then, manual search was performed using the reference lists of the included studies to identify additional articles.

Strict and uniform inclusion and exclusion standards were applied to select the literature, and two independent researchers used a blind method to reduce the selection bias. To thoroughly assess each included study and lower the within-study bias, the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) score standard [14] was applied for quality assessment.

Each item in the MINORS has three scores:

0, unreported;

1, reported but inadequately or partially;

2, adequately reported.

All extracted data were double-checked, and any questions that arose during the screening and data extraction were discussed within the group to achieve a consensus.

If consensus was not attained, a third reviewer served as an adjudicator.

Results: The Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) was used to assess the methodological quality of included studies. Nine studies were identified as relevant for the systematic review. In total, 806 patients with 806 teeth were examined for intentional teeth replantation. The success rate was greater than 90% in five studies (55.55%) and between 70% and 80% in four studies.

The success rate for post-surgical outcomes of intentional replantation of teeth cases is 87.95%

Conclusion: The long-term success and survival rate of IR are likely dependent upon short extra oral time, reduced pocket depth, type of tooth, type of root-end filling material, and the prevention of atraumatic tooth root damage.

Keywords: Intentional Replantation, Tooth, Survival Rate, Root Canal Treatment, Systematic Review.