Mathews Journal of Veterinary Science

2572-6579

Current Issue Volume 8, Issue 4 - 2024

Prevalence of Brucellosis in Camels in Different Districts of Interior Sindh, Pakistan

Naimat Ullah1, Gohar Khan2, Adnan Yousaf3,*, Faiza Habib1

1Department of Livestock & Dairy Development Quetta, Pakistan

2Institute of Animal Sciences Quetta, Pakistan

3Faculty of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Sciences, Sindh Agriculture University Tandojam, Pakistan

*Corresponding author: Adnan Yousaf, Faculty of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Sciences, Sindh Agriculture University Tandojam, Pakistan, Tel: +923005662008; E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: July 03, 2024

Published Date: September 17, 2024

Citation: Ullah N, et al. (2024). Prevalence of Brucellosis in Camels in Different Districts of Interior Sindh, Pakistan. Mathews J Vet Sci. 8(4):49.

Copyrights: Ullah N, et al. © (2024).

ABSTRACT

Brucellosis affects a broad range of animal species, including humans, and is more severe in humans than in animals. This zoonotic disease poses a significant health burden. Our study involved testing 100 serum samples and 50 milk samples from camels across three districts of Sindh province, Pakistan. Screening tests—Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT), serum agglutination test (SAT), and competitive-ELISA (c-ELISA)—revealed an overall prevalence of brucellosis of 21%, 21%, and 13%, respectively. The prevalence was higher among females (26%) than males (16%) based on RBPT and SAT results, and also among camels younger than 9 years (13.33%). Despite testing, none of the milk samples showed positive results for brucellosis antibodies. In conclusion, our findings indicate that brucellosis is prevalent among camels in the studied areas of Sindh province.

Keywords: Brucellosis, Camels, Zoonosis, Sindh.

INTRODUCTION

Brucellosis is a well-known disease affecting a wide range of animal species, including humans, and is caused by bacteria belonging to the genus Brucella [1]. The causative agent is typically transmitted vertically or horizontally through close contact such as sexual intercourse, contact with secretions, and by ingesting contaminated materials like aborted fetuses [2]. In humans, brucellosis manifests with clinical symptoms resembling a debilitating chronic flu-like illness, whereas in domestic animals it often leads to abortion, infertility, and reduced milk production [3].

Due to its zoonotic nature, brucellosis poses a significant global burden on both human health and animal productivity [2]. Studies indicate that the highest risk of transmission occurs through indirect contact with animals, particularly through the consumption of unpasteurized milk and dairy products [1]. Sheep and goats are identified as higher-risk species compared to camels and cattle. Additionally, assisting animals during parturition can facilitate disease transmission [4].

Ruminants infected with Brucella spp. are recognized as the primary source of human infection [5]. The prevalence of human brucellosis has notably increased in Middle Eastern and Central Asian countries, including Syria, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Iran, and Turkey, with annual incidence rates ranging from 21 to 160 cases per 100,000 individuals [6].

According to the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE), brucellosis accounts for approximately 500,000 human cases annually, making it the second most important zoonotic disease [7]. Recent years have seen descriptions of Brucella abortus seroprevalence in cattle and buffaloes in Pakistan [8]. Brucella melitensis and Brucella abortus are responsible for brucellosis in camels, presenting challenges in diagnosis due to the limited clinical signs these organisms provoke [9].

Camels serve as vital sources of meat and milk in many desert regions worldwide, including Pakistan [7]. This study represents a cross-sectional survey on the seroprevalence of brucellosis in Sindh province, Pakistan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethical approval

This experiment was performed considering to all animal rights (Society for Protection and Care of Animals. Sindh Agriculture University Tandojam, Pakistan).

Objective of the Study

The main objective of this study is to record the prevalence of brucellosis disease in camels in different districts of Sindh for which take the preventive steps to prevent the economic loss of farmers and GDP of the country.

Selection of Sites

In 2024, three primary districts of Sindh province Thatta, Badin, and Tharparkar were selected to assess the seroprevalence of Brucella infections in camels and to identify associated risk factors.

Collection of Sample

A total of n=100 blood samples were collected and refrigerated overnight to separate serum.

Lab Analysis Protocol

Serum was subsequently used for the Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT), serum agglutination test (SAT), and competitive-ELISA (c-ELISA) tests. In the c-ELISA test, strongly positive samples exhibited a clear transparent appearance, while negative samples appeared orange. Additionally, 50 milk samples obtained from lactating female camels were subjected to the Milk Ring Test (MRT).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A total of 100 serum samples, comprising 50 from males and 50 from females, were collected and examined using the Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT), Serum Agglutination Test (SAT), and competitive ELISA (c-ELISA). The tests identified 21, 21, and 13 positive cases of brucellosis, respectively. The highest prevalence of brucellosis was detected in Tharparker across all serological tests [10]. This high prevalence may be attributed to the free movement and grazing of animals on open pastures, close contact with infected animals, and the lack of proper treatment for infected animals [11]. Our study found a higher prevalence of brucellosis in camels, which contrasts with another study reporting a lower prevalence of 9.26% but aligns with studies indicating an 11.42% prevalence [12]. RBPT and SAT detected the highest prevalence, although there is a risk of false positives due to cross-reactions with antibodies from other bacterial species [13]. Conversely, c-ELISA is considered more reliable than the other two tests [14]. The variation in prevalence may be due to factors such as parity, breed, management practices, seasonal variations, or potential issues in observation recording during the investigation.

A similar cross-sectional study conducted in Ethiopia recorded a brucellosis prevalence of 11.9% by RBPT and 7.6% by the Complement Fixation Test (CFT), concluding that camel brucellosis was widely distributed across the Afar province [15]. Although a lower prevalence was found in Ethiopia, our study's findings in the Badin district of Sindh showed a similar prevalence to that recorded in two Ethiopian districts via RBPT [16]. Thus, the prevalence results in the three districts of Sindh align with those demonstrated in Ethiopia [17].

The prevalence of brucellosis was detected in 26% of females and 16% of males using RBPT and SAT. However, lower prevalence rates of 10% in males and 16% in females were found using c-ELISA (Table 1).

Table 1. Brucellosis positive samples from blood samples of animals of different genders and age groups

A. Different districts

RBPT

SAT

c-ELISA

Thatta

 

 

 

No. of samples examined

33

33

33

Positive samples No. (%)

Tharparker

6 (18.18%)

6 (18.18%)

2 (6.06%)

No. of samples examined

34

34

34

Positive samples No. (%)

Badin

11 (32.35%)

11 (32.35%)

8 (23.0%)

No. of samples examined

33

33

33

Positive samples No. (%)

4 (12.12%)

4 (12.12%)

3 (9.09%)

B. Different genders

 

 

 

Females

 

 

 

No. of serum samples

50

50

50

Positive samples No. (%)

13 (26.0%)

13 (26.0%)

8 (16.0%)

Males

 

 

 

No. of serum samples

50

50

50

Positive samples No. (%)

8 (16.0%)

8 (16.0%)

5 (10.0%)

C. Different age groups

 

 

 

Age under 9 years

 

 

 

No. of serum samples

60

60

60

Positive samples No. (%)

Age above 10 years

17 (28.33%)

17 (28.33%)

8 (13.33%)

No. of serum samples

40

40

40

Positive samples No. (%)

4 (10.0%)

4 (10.0%)

5 (12.5%)

The higher prevalence in females compared to males may be due to the increased risk of infection during estrus when the cervix remains open for more than a week [16]. Our findings align with a study reporting a higher prevalence of brucellosis (38.5%) in adult females with reproductive issues such as abortion, stillbirth, and retained fetal membrane [18]. However, another study found no statistically significant difference, contradicting our results [18].

Table 1 indicates a higher prevalence of brucellosis in camels under 9 years of age, while a lower prevalence was recorded in camels over 10 years of age. This higher prevalence in younger camels might be due to their lower immunity levels [19]. Our study considered the age of sampled camels, revealing that 28.33% of camels under 9 years were more prone to the disease, whereas only 10% of camels over 10 years were affected [12]. This finding is inconsistent with other studies suggesting that brucellosis commonly persists in sexually mature camels [6].

Additionally, we collected 50 milk samples to detect Brucella antibodies using the Milk Ring Test (MRT). None of the milk samples tested positive, which contradicts a study reporting 2 out of 3 milk samples positive using the same test [11]. Factors contributing to the high prevalence of brucellosis in camels may include the management systems in the studied districts [15]. The mixing of camels during migration, at watering points, and in night enclosures can facilitate disease transmission from infected to healthy animals [20,21].

CONCLUSION

Brucellosis is prevalent among camels in the study districts, with sex and age identified as significant risk factors for individual animal prevalence. Therefore, it is assumed that the disease will likely spread to unaffected camels and herds during grazing and at watering points.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The author is thankful to all dairy farm and animal owners and technical staff for their full support and encouragement during the whole period of research work. The authors are also thanking to lab supervisors for their cooperation.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest with respect to this article's research, authorship, and/or publications.

REFERENCES

  1. Rafieipour A, Ziaei N. (2007). Brucellosis of camels in Iran. Vet On-line Available from: http://priory.com/vet/Brucellosis_in_camels.htm
  2. Baloch AS, Rasheed A, Rind R, Sahito JK, et al. (2017). Seroprevalence of brucellosis in camels in Sindh, Pakistan. Pakistan journal of zoology. 49(1).
  3. Aldridge KE, Henderberg A, Sanders CV. (1989). Lomefloxacin (SC 47111 or NY-198), a new difluorinated quinolone: comparison of the in vitro activity with other broad spectrum antimicrobials against Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter spp, Aeromonas spp, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 12(3 Suppl):1S-6S.
  4. Ali S, Ali Q, Abatih EN, Ullah N, et. al. (2013). Sero-prevalence of Brucella abortus among dairy cattle and buffaloes in Pothohar Plateau, Pakistan. Pak J Zool. 45(4):1041-1046.
  5. Baqir Y, Yousaf A, Soomro AG. (2021). Sorex araneus is a pathogenic microbial threat in commercial poultry farms. Multidisciplinary Science Journal. 3(4):2021016-2021016.
  6. Arain MB, Babar A, Sarki I. (2021). Detection of Brucella Abortus in Caprine and Ovine by Real-Time PCR Assay. Anim Veterinary Sci. 9(5):141-144.
  7. Abbas M, Kumar L, Yousaf A, Lanjar Z. (2021). Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in buffalo and cow calves in rural areas of Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Biomedical Journal of Scientific and Technical Research. 40(2):32159-2165.
  8. Yousaf A, Jabbar A, Ditta YA. (2017). Effect of pre-warming on broiler breeder eggs hatchability and post-hatch performance. Journal of Animal Health and Production. 5(1):1-4.
  9. Jabbar A, Yousaf A. (2017). Effect of age wise incubation programme on broiler breeder hatchability and post hatch performance. Online Journal of Animal and Feed Research. 7(1):13-17.
  10. Hussain D, Yousaf A, Wakeel A. (2021). Prevalence Of Respiratory Dieases In Different Broiler And Layer Poultry Farms In Rawalpindi Of Punjab-Pakistan. Research in: Agricultural & Veterinary Sciences. 5(3):85-91.
  11. Naazir S, Naazir N, Naazir T, Yousaf A. (2021). Incidences Of Brucella Abortus In Serum And Milk Samples Of Cattle In Rawalpindi. Research in: Agricultural & Veterinary Sciences. 5(3):121-127.
  12. Yousaf A, Abbas M, Laghari RA, Abbas U, BiBi N. (2017). Epidemiological investigation on outbreak of brucellosis at private dairy farms of Sindh, Pakistan. Online J Anim Feed Res. 7(1):09-12.
  13. Khalil R, Sharif A. (2022). A Comprehensive Review on Epidemiology, Prevention and Control of FMD Virus in Pakistan. Biomedical Sciences. 8(3):86-96.
  14. Yousaf A, Laghari RA, Shoaib M, Khetran IB. (2016). The prevalence of brucellosis in Kundhi buffaloes in District Hyderabad, Pakistan. J Anim Health Prod. 4(1):6-8.
  15. Jamali MK, Yousaf A, Sharna SN. (2021). Assessments of Prevalence of Brucellosis in Camels Through the Contrast of Serological Assessments in South Punjab, Pakistan. American Journal of Zoology. 4(40):65-68.
  16. Yousaf A, Abbas M, Laghari RA, Kachiwal AB. (2016). Therapeutical management of tetanus in Kundhi buffalo calf at Hyderabad, Sindh. Online J Anim Feed Res. 6(5):103-106.
  17. Yousaf A, Rais M-ul-N, Mushtaq A, Jamil T. (2018). Prevalence of black quarter (BQ) disease in private dairy farm in Hyderabad, Sindh province of Pakistan. Online J Anim Feed Res. 8(1):01-04.
  18. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2003). FAO, Italy.
  19. World Health Organization. (2005). The control of neglected zoonotic diseases. Report of a joint WHO/ DFID-AHP. Geneva. pp. 54. Available at: http://www. who.int/zoonoses/Report_Sept06.pdf.
  20. Ali I, Chaudhry MS, Farooq U. (2009). Camel rearing in Cholistan Desert of Pakistan. Pakistan Vet J. 29(2):85-92.
  21. Yousaf A, Khalil-Ur-Rahman SR. (2015). To evaluate the Sero-Occurrence of brucellosis in buffalo and goat through the contrast of serological assessments in Tandojam (Pakistan). IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science. 8(1):45-46.

Creative Commons License

© 2015 Mathews Open Access Journals. All Rights Reserved.

Open Access by Mathews Open Access Journals is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based On a Work at Mathewsopenaccess.com