Mathews Journal of Ophthalmology

2474-6932

Previous Issues Volume 1, Issue 1 - 2016

Research Article Abstract PDF  

Awareness and Knowledge of Ocular Effects of Diabetes among Diabetics-Evidence from a Hospital Based Study

Mohammed Abdul-Kabir1,Bright Asare-Bediako1,David Ben Kumah1,Eghonghon Ehianata Onoikhua2

1Department of Optometry and Visual Science, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.

2Department of Optometry, Madonna University, Elele, Rivers State, Nigeria.

Corresponding Author: Mohammed Abdul-Kabir, Department of Optometry and Visual Science, B9 COS Building, KNUSTKumasi, Ghana. Tel: +233266307211; E-Mail[email protected]

Received Date: 12 Feb 2016    Accepted Date: 05 May 2016    Published Date: 24 May 2016

Copyright © 2016 Abdul-Kabir M

Citation: Abdul-Kabir M, Asare-Bediako B, BenKumah D, Onoikhua E, et al. (2016). Awareness and Knowledge of Ocular Effects of Diabetes among Diabetics- Evidence from a Hospital Based Study. Mathews J Ophthalmol. 1(1): 001.

 
ABSTRACT

Background:Diabetes mellitus is reaching epidemic proportions in many countries, and the impact of vision loss due to diabetic eye disease on public health is a major concern. Unfortunately, there is a lack of awareness about the existing interventions for preventing diabetic eye diseases and the management of complications. This study was conducted to evaluate the level of awareness and knowledge of ocular complications of diabetic patients in a teaching hospital in Ghana.

Methods:The study was a descriptive cross sectional study. A detailed interview-guided questionnaire was used to obtain qualitative information on the level of awareness and knowledge about ocular complications of diabetes and attitude towards preventing diabetic ocular complications among diabetic patients. Completed data was entered in Microsoft Excel 2010 and SPSS-version 20.0 for Windows and analyzed and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results:150 diabetic patients consented and took part in the study. There were more females (107) than males (43) with an overall age range between 11-90 years. The age range with the highest number of patients was 61-70 years (37.3%). The level of education with the highest number of respondents was junior high school level (J.H.S), which represented 25.3% of patients studied. Majority (59.3%) of respondents had low level of education (up to the junior high school level). Out of the 150 patients, a total of 122 (74.6%) were aware that diabetes had effects on the eyes and vision. 22 (14.7%) patients responded that the condition had no effects on the eyes and 16 (10.7%) patients responded no idea. 69 (46%) patients had never visited the eye clinic before the study, 44 (29.3%) patients responded they visited the eye clinic only once a while and 17 patients only visited the eye clinic if their vision had reduced. 54 (36%) patients responded they were referred to seek eye care by their primary physician, while 96 (64%) patients responded they were not informed to seek eye care services upon first diagnoses.

Conclusion:There is still a gap to be filled with respect to level of awareness and knowledge of ocular effects of diabetes between diabetic patients of lower and higher level of literacy. It is important that public health efforts in the field are intensified, particularly in developing countries. Also, physicians should ensure that diabetics are adequately educated on the ocular complications of diabetes and the need for regular eye examinations.

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a clinical syndrome which is characterized by hyperglycaemia due to an absolute or relative deficiency of insulin [1]. It is usually irreversible and, although patients can have a reasonably normal lifestyle, its late complications such as increased risk of coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, stroke and microvascular damage causing diabetic retinopathy and nephropathy result in reduced life expectancy and major health costs [2]. Diabetes mellitus is reaching epidemic proportions in many countries, including Ghana [3]. As population size of the aged, prevalence of obesity and physical inactivity increase, the number of people with diabetes is likely to increase: current projections estimate that 439 million adults will be affected by type 2 by 2030 and the rate of type 1 diabetes is increasing worldwide [4-7]. It has been reported that diabetes accounts for 15% of all blindness [8]. Therefore, the impact of vision loss due to diabetic eye disease on public health is a major concern. For example, in 2000, 7.5 million cases of diabetes were reported on the African continent alone, and it is also estimated that more than 80% of people with diabetes in Africa remain undiagnosed [8]. Uncontrolled diabetes causes a host of problems in the body, one of which is eye problems or vision loss. It imposes daunting health issues on societal healthcare by its debilitating vascular complications, those of which increase the burden on healthcare authorities globally [9, 10]. Diabetic ocular complications are increasingly becoming a major cause of blindness throughout the world in the age group 20-60 years which usually results in loss of productivity, quality of life and socio-economic burdens on communities [11-13]. It is therefore very important that all efforts necessary are directed towards at least delaying the onset of these ocular complications. Two most common causes of vision loss from diabetes are cataract and diabetic retinopathy. Diabetic retinopathy is the leading cause of blindness among working-aged adults, and studies estimate its global overall prevalence to be 34.6%, and highest among African Americans [5]. It has drawn much public health concern because it is the most common complication of diabetes mellitus and is a leading cause of visual loss in industrialized nations [9]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) estimates available, diabetic retinopathy is responsible for 3.9% (1.8 million) of the 45 million cases of blindness worldwide [14]. Although diabetic retinopathy is not totally preventable or curable, many cases of blindness can be avoided due to advances in the management of diabetes and diabetic retinopathy [15]. Many adults living with diabetes remain unaware of their ocular condition until their diabetic retinopathy has progressed to a stage at which treatment is difficult. This makes early detection paramount to preservation of useful vision: early detection of diabetic retinopathy is critical, given that prompt treatment increases the likelihood of preserving vision and early detection and timely treatment can prevent nearly all cases of severe vision loss and blindness [16, 17]. Unfortunately, not every diabetic who should undergo annual dilated eye examinations receives such services, and this situation is reported to be influenced by lack of insurance and healthcare access, knowledge of diabetes-specific ocular risk, health literacy, cultural, and language barriers [16]. Despite significant advances in treatment procedures, many diabetics still do not receive appropriate eye care in the right time frame [10]. Literature documents disparities between different racial and ethnic groups in the access and receipt of eye care services to treat illness. In the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study, researchers found that Latinos were much more likely to have received general medical care than to have received eye care [18]. Wang et al. reported that for people with diabetes, only 59 percent who were African American Medicare beneficiaries underwent an eye examination in the course of a year. For those Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 to 69 years, only 60 percent had seen an eye care professional in the two years prior [19]. African Americans have been found to have poorer access to and use of eye care services, which has ultimately led to increases in visual disorders [20]. Also, poorer access to medical care and reduced health literacy compared to Whites have been reasons cited for increased prevalence of diabetic retinopathy among ethnic minorities [21]. This shows that among the major eye diseases, race and ethnicity may play a large role in the development and progression of eye disorders. Saikumar differentiates between awareness and knowledge thus: the former refers to hearing about a disease while the latter refers to understanding the causes or treatment of the disease [22]. However, both concepts play key roles in how diabetic patients access eye care. Although the levels of awareness and knowledge about diabetic ocular complications among diabetics have improved in recent years, there is still inadequate awareness about the real dimension of the problem among the general public and many diabetics as well. Typically, studies have reported a very low level of awareness in Ghana [23, 24]. There is also a lack of awareness about the existing interventions for preventing diabetes and the management of complications [25]. This study was conducted to evaluate the level of awareness and knowledge of ocular complications of diabetes among diabetic patients in a teaching hospital in Ghana.

METHODS

Study Design and Sampling

This study was a cross-sectional study carried out among diabetic patients aged 11 years and above visiting the Diabetic Clinic at the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital from March 1, 2014 to April 1, 2014. A convenient sampling technique was employed. Overall, 150 patients participated in the study

Data Collection Technique/Analysis

Information that was relevant to the study was obtained from the participants with an interviewer-administered questionnaire. These included but were not limited to knowledge about ocular complications of diabetes and attitude of patients towards preventing ocular complications of diabetes. Trained interviewers provided translation services to participants who were illiterate. The average time for the administration of a single questionnaire was 10 minutes and this was administered in the language that the respondent understood (English or Twi).

Data Analysis

Data was analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2010 and SPSSversion 20.0 for Windows. Frequency distribution was used to analyze participants’ demographic characteristics. Participants’ knowledge about diabetes mellitus and ocular effect of diabetes mellitus as well as attitude towards avoiding diabetic ocular complications were assessed using percentages. Descriptive statistics and Chi-square test were employed to find significant differences between comparable categorical groups. Statistical significance was set at p values less than 0.05 (p < 0.05).

Ethical Considerations

This study was reviewed and approved by the Committee on Human Research, Publications and Ethics of the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, School of Medical Sciences and Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi. For each patient sampled, an informed consent was obtained before participation. For patients less than 18 years, an informed consent was obtained from their parents. The study upheld the tenets of Declaration of Helsinki at all stages.

RESULTS

Table 1 shows the socio-demographic characteristics of the 150 patients who took part in the study. There were more females (107) than males (43) with an overall age range between 11-90 years. The age range with the highest number of patients was 61-70 years (37.3%) and that with the least number of patients was 11-20 years and 81-90 years, both with 3 (2%) patients each. The level of education with the highest number of respondents was junior high school level (J.H.S), which represented 25.3% of patients studied. However, the educational level of majority of respondents was very minimal, in this case up to the junior high school level, which represented 59.3% of the respondents. The level of education with the least number of patients was vocational school level with 9 patients (6%).

Table 1: Distribution of Gender, Age and Level of education.

Characteristics Number Percentage
Gender Male Female Total 43 107 150 28.7 71.3 100
Age 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 81-90 Total 3 4 5 27 39 56 13 3 150 2 2.7 3.3 18 26 37.3 8.7 2 100
Level of Education Illiterate Primary J.H.S S.H.S Vocational Tertiary Total 36 15 38 37 9 15 150 24 10 25.3 24.7 6 10 100

Patients’ awareness of the effects of diabetes on the eyes was studied. Out of the 150 patients, a total of 122 (74.6%) responded that they were aware that diabetes had effects on the eyes and vision. 22 (14.7%) patients responded that the condition had no effects on the eyes and 16 (10.7%) patients said they had no idea. Table 2 shows the distribution of the awareness of the effects of diabetics on the eye amongst diabetic patients with gender.

Table 2: Awareness of effects of diabetics on the eye by Gender.

  Male Female Total
Have Effect 30 82 112
Have NO Effect 7 15 22
No Idea 6 10 16
Total 43 107 150

Patients were asked about the frequency in which they go for an eye exam since they were diagnosed. 69 (46%) responded they had never visited the eye clinic before the study. The number of patients in this category appeared to increase with age but was not statistically significant (p=0.096), with the majority between the ages of 61-70 years. 44 (29.3%) patients responded they visited the eye clinic only once a while. 17 patients responded they only visited the eye clinic if their vision had reduced. 20(13.4%) patients had eye examination appointments at regular intervals (monthly).  The association between frequency of eye examination and referral by primary physician was examined and was found to be positive and statistically significant (p=0.031). Patients who were referred to the eye clinic by their primary physician upon initial diagnoses appeared to have their eye examined more often than those who were not referred.

Table 3: Frequency of eye exam by Gender, Age and Level of education.

  Frequency of Eye Exam
Characteristics Only if vision is poor Every 3 months Every 6 months Every 12 months Every 2 years Not regularly Not at all Total
Gender Male Female TOTAL 10 7 17 2 8 10 0 1 1 3 5 8 1 0 1 7 37 44 20 49 69 43 107 150
AGE 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 81-90 TOTAL 0 0 2 2 8 3 2 0 17 0 0 0 2 3 5 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 10 8 16 5 3 44 3 2 3 12 19 24 6 0 69 3 4 5 27 39 56 13 3 150
Level of Educ Illiterate Primary J.H.S S.H.S Vocational Tertiary TOTAL 4 1 4 2 2 4 17 2 1 2 1 1 3 10 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 4 1 0 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 3 10 13 4 7 44 21 10 20 17 1 0 69 36 15 38 37 9 15 150

Patients were asked if their physicians advised them to see an eye care professional after they were first diagnosed of diabetes. The association between level of awareness of ocular effects of diabetes and referral by primary physician was examined: the level of awareness appeared to be higher among patients who had been referred and this was found to be statistically significant (p=0.042). 54 (36%) patients responded they were referred to seek eye care by their primary physician, while 96 (64%) patients responded they were not informed to seek eye care services upon first diagnoses. Majority of the patients were not advised to see an eye care professional after they were first diagnosed of diabetes.

DISCUSSION

This study showed that the level of awareness of the ocular effects of diabetes was high among diabetic patients: 74.6% of patients were aware of the effect of diabetes on the eyes while only 10.7% had no idea whether diabetes affected the eyes and 16(10.7%) responded diabetes did not affect the eyes. Most participants were aware that uncontrolled diabetes had negative ocular effects, consistent with findings in other studies [3, 22, 26]. In such a study population where the level of education of majority of participants was junior high school or less, the high level of awareness is most likely due to recent advancement in public health efforts on health education. However, there is still a significant number of diabetics unaware of the ocular complications of the condition, and this puts them at risk of preventable blindness. This is because other studies have revealed that people with diabetes who have less education are more likely to suffer much more complications compared to those with higher level of education [27, 28]. This study also revealed that most patients (more than half (64%)) were not informed to seek eye care services upon initial diagnoses of diabetes. A study by Khandekar et al. revealed that a significant proportion of physicians managing diabetic patients lacked knowledge about different parts of the eye that are affected by diabetes, and this may affect patient education in the consulting room [29]. Thus, it is likely that these patients were not adequately educated on the complications of diabetes upon initial diagnoses, and this reflected in the frequency of visits to eye clinics among these patients. This is particularly unhealthy for such patients because studies have shown that increasing patients’ knowledge regarding disease and its complications has significant benefits with regard to patient compliance to treatment and to decreasing complications associated with the disease [30]. Some studies have documented that diabetic education had changed health-seeking behavior and practice among diabetics [31, 32]. These health education efforts, which are best performed on a one-on-one basis between physician and patient, would go a long way to further bridge the gap between higher and lower levels of education with respect to knowledge of diabetes and vision among diabetic patients if physicians could incorporate them adequately into their practice. The study also revealed that most of the patients did not receive regular eye examination. Only 13.4% of patients had regular monthly eye examinations. This could be due to inadequate patient education as discussed earlier, lack of health insurance, cultural and other barriers [16]. A study by McCarty et al also reported that a significant number of people with diabetes do not have access to eye care on a regular basis. Another study showed that, rate of receipt of recommended eye care by diabetics was strikingly lower among African Americans, as only 22 percent of study participants reported seeing an ophthalmologist in the previous year [33]. This puts most of these diabetics at a greater risk of suffering ocular complications because regular screening of all patients with diabetes is recommended to avoid visual impairment due to diabetic retinopathy [10]. Also, the American Diabetes Association recommends annual dilated eye examinations after diagnosis of diabetes mellitus for the prevention of blindness [16]. It has been reported that regular eye screening and improved access to eye care decreases visual impairment due to diabetic retinopathy and evidently lowers the total costs incurred by the healthcare system during the current diabetes epidemic, something developing countries like Ghana desperately need [10].

CONCLUSION

Although recent advancement in public health education has improved health knowledge among diabetics, there is still a gap to be filled with respect to level of awareness and knowledge of ocular effects of diabetes between diabetic patients with lower level of literacy and those of higher level of literacy. Since this is crucial to their health seeking behavior and prevention of blindness due to diabetic retinopathy, it is important that public health efforts in the field are intensified, particularly in developing countries. Also, physicians should ensure that diabetics are adequately educated on the ocular complications of diabetes and the need for regular eye examinations. These measures would help in the fight against blindness due to diabetic retinopathy.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors wish to express their profound gratitude to Emmanuel Yankey for his contribution towards data collection.

REFERENCES

  1. World Health Organization. (2005). Geneva: WHO. Prevention of Blindness from Diabetes Mellitus. Report of a WHO Consultation in Geneva, Switzerland 9- 11 Nov. 1-3.
  2. Nathan DM. (1993). Long Term Complication of Diabetes Mellitus. New Engl J Med. 328(23), 1676-1685.
  3. Abaidoo B and Adam S.Y. (2015). Evaluating the Awareness and Knowledge of the Effect of Diabetes Mellitus on the Eye among Adult Diabetics in Accra. IJHSR. 5(9), 105-112.
  4. Shaw JE, Sicree RA and Zimmet PZ. (2010). Global Estimates of the Prevalence of Diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 87(1), 4-14.
  5. Yau JW, Rogers SL, Kawasaki R, Lamoureux EL, et al. (2012). Global Prevalence and Major Risk Factors of Diabetic Retinopathy. Diabetes Care. 35(3), 556-564.
  6. Borchers AT, Uibo R and Gershwin ME. (2010). The Geoepidemiology of Type 1 Diabetes. Autoimmun Rev. 9(5), A355- A365.
  7. Harjutsalo V, Sjoberg L and Tuomilehto J. (2008). Time Trends in the Incidence of Type 1 Diabetes in Finnish Children: a Cohort Study. Lancet. 371(9626), 1777-1782.
  8. Harris MI. (2001). Racial and Ethnic Differences in Health Care Access and Health Outcomes for Adults with Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 24(3), 454-459.
  9. Stitt AW, Lois N, Medina RJ, Adamson, et al. (2013). Advances in Our Understanding of Diabetic Retinopathy. Clinical Science. 125(1), 1-17.
  10. Haulata N, Aikkila R, Korpelainen J, Keskitalo A, et al. (2014). Marked Reductions in Visual Impairment due to Diabetic Retinopathy Achieved by Efficient Screening and Timely Treatment. Acta Ophthalmol. 92(6), 582-587.
  11. Dwivedi RN and Krishna G. (1999). Epidemiology of Diabetes in India. Indian J Community Med. 24, 40-44.
  12. Thylefors B, Negrel AD, Pararajasegaram R, Dadzie KY, et al. (1995). Global Data on Blindness. Bull World Health Organ. 73(1), 115-121.
  13. NPCB – Government of India. (2001). Vision 2020: The Right to Sight. Plan of Action, 7, 5.2.1.1.
  14. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, et al. (2004). Global Prevalence of Diabetes: Estimates for the Year 2000 and Projections for 2030. Diabetes Care. 27(5), 1047-1053.
  15. Sloan FA, Belsky D, Ruiz D, Lee P, et al. (2008). Changes in Incidence of Diabetes Mellitus-Related Eye Diseae among US Elderly Persons, 1994-2005. Arch Ophthalmol. 126(11), 1548- 1553.
  16. Lee DJ, Kumar N, Feuer WJ, Chiu-Fang C, et al. (2014). Dilated Eye Examination Screening Guideline Compliance among Patients with Diabetes without a Diabetic Retinopathy Diagnosis: the Role of Geographic Access. BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care. 2(1), e000031.
  17. Cheung N, Mitchell P and Wong TY. (2010). Diabetic retinopathy. Lancet. 376(9735), 124-136.
  18. Verma L, Gunjan P, Terwari HK, Gupta SK, et al. (2003). Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy by Non-ophthalmologist: an effective public health tool. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica. 81(4), 373-377.
  19. Wang CY and Fenske MM. (1996). Self-care of Adults with Non-insulin-dependent Diabetes Mellitus: Influence of Family and Friends. Diabetes Educ. 22(5), 465-470.
  20. Devgan. (2000).
  21. Schillinger D, Grumbach K, Piette J, Wang F, et al. (2002). Association of Health Literacy with Diabetes Outcome. JAMA. 288(4), 475-482.
  22. Saikumar SJ, Giridhar A, Mahesh G, Elias A, et al. (2007). Awareness about Eye Diseases among Diabetic Patients in South India. Bull World Health Organ. 20(61), 16-17.
  23. Ovenseri-Ogbomo GO, Abokyi S, Koffuor GA, Abokyi E, et al. (2013). Knowledge of Diabetes and its Associated Ocular Manifestations by Diabetic Patients: A study at Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Ghana. Niger Med J. 54(4), 217-223.
  24. Schmid KL, Schmid LM and Pedersen C. (2003). Knowledge of the Ocular Effects of Diabetes among the General Population of Australia and the Members of Diabetes Australia. BMC Health Serv Res. 86(2), 91-103
  25. Park K. (2013). Diabetes. In: Park K, editor. Park’s Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine, 22nd ed. Jabalpur, Banarasidas Bhanot. 362-366.
  26. Rajiv K, Saleh AH, Harith AH, Jawad AL, et al. (2010). Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Regarding Eye Complications and Care among Omani Persons with Diabetes - A cross Sectional Study. Oman J Ophthalmol. 3(2), 60-65.
  27. Otiniano ME, Black SA, Ray LA, Markides KS, et al. (2002). Correlates of Diabetes Complications in Mexican-American Elders. Ethn Dis. 12(2), 252-258.
  28. West SK, Munoz B, Klein R, Broman AT, et al. (2002). Risk Factors for Type II Diabetes and Diabetic Retinopathy in a Mexican-American Population: Proyecto VER. Am J Ophthalmol. 134(3), 390-398.
  29. Khandekar R and Mohammed AJ. (2005). Visual Disabilities among Diabetics in Oman. Saudi Med J. 26(5), 836-844.
  30. Michell G, Mary J and Isaac R. (2008). Knowledge of Diabetes, its Treatment and Complications amongst Diabetic Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital. Indian J Community Med. 33(3), 204-206.
  31. Wee HL, Li SC and HO HK. (2002). Public awareness of diabetes mellitus in Singapore. Singapore Med. 43(3), 128-134.
  32. Hoque MA, Islam MS, Nazmul HAM, Aziz R, et al. (2009). Achievement of awareness in a diabetic population. J Medicine. 10(suppl-1), 7-10.
  33. Anderson RM, Funnell MM, Butler PM, Arnold MS, et al. (1995). Patient empowerment: results of a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 18(7), 943-949.

Creative Commons License

© 2015 Mathews Open Access Journals. All Rights Reserved.

Open Access by Mathews Open Access Journals is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based On a Work at Mathewsopenaccess.com